Malta PN submits formal response to ‘so-called’ planning reform, calls for withdrawal
|

PN Launches War on ‘Concrete Cash-Register’ Planning Reform: Withdraw or Face Uprising

**PN Slams Government’s ‘So-Called’ Planning Reform, Demands Complete Withdrawal Amid Heritage Fears**

Valletta – The Nationalist Party has fired a blistering broadside at Robert Abela’s administration, formally submitting a 38-page rebuttal that brands the proposed planning reform “a cultural bulldozer in a tailor-made suit”. PN leader Bernard Grech personally delivered the document to the Planning Authority HQ in Floriana on Tuesday morning, flanked by architects, heritage NGOs and residents clutching black-and-white photos of grandparents outside now-demolished townhouses.

“This is not reform; it is a fire-sale of our limestone soul,” Grech declared, gesturing towards the baroque façade of the Auberge de Provence across the square. “They want to turn Malta into a concrete cash-register, but we will not trade our skyline for a skyline of cranes.”

The government’s 200-page White Paper, unveiled in March, proposes sweeping changes: higher permissible building heights in urban conservation areas, fast-track permits for mega-developments above 50 apartments, and the scrapping of the 2016 height limitation regulations that have protected village cores. Culture Minister Owen Bonnici insists the overhaul will “streamline bureaucracy” and unlock affordable housing. Yet the PN counters that the fine print opens the floodgates for speculative towers inside village centres and allows developers to pay “heritage compensation” fees in lieu of restoration.

Local context matters. Malta’s construction industry contributes roughly 5.8 % to GDP and employs 11,000 workers, but it also generates 600,000 tonnes of waste annually—four times the EU average per capita. In the past decade, 40 % of traditional Maltese wooden balconies have disappeared, replaced by aluminium clones or bricked-up entirely. The reform, critics warn, would accelerate that erosion.

Walking through Sliema’s Rue d’Argent, pensioner Doris Zammit, 78, points to a 12-storey grey block that replaced the art-nouveau Casa Said. “My mother sold lace from that doorway during the war,” she sighs. “Now it’s a gym and 42 Airbnbs. If this law passes, say goodbye to the few remaining corners where we still hear church bells instead of pile-drivers.”

The PN’s submission, seen by Hot Malta, zeroes in on three flash-points:

1. **Urban Conservation Areas (UCAs)** – The reform shrinks buffer zones around scheduled properties from 38 m to 20 m, effectively allowing 10 extra floors of shadow-casting development.
2. **Transferable Development Rights (TDRs)** – Developers who promise to restore a rural palazzo can “transfer” its unused volume to a seaside high-rise elsewhere, turning heritage into a tradable commodity.
3. **Environmental Impact Assessments** – Projects under 150 units would bypass full EIA screening, a threshold that covers 83 % of current applications.

Heritage NGO Din l-Art Ħelwa calculates that 2,300 traditional townhouses—many in hamlets like Żejtun, Balzan and Naxxum—would become economically unviable to maintain, their owners tempted to sell to developers rather than face rising restoration costs.

Yet the issue transcends stone and mortar. Festa season is approaching; in Għaxaq, villagers have already warned the parish priest that donations for fireworks will be diverted to legal fees if the reform passes. “Our feast is not just saints and statues,” explains band-club president Clayton Briffa. “It’s the narrow streets where we carry the statue. Widen them for garages and you kill the intimacy that makes the festa ours.”

Tourism operators are also jittery. Boutique hoteliers in Birgu report a 22 % spike in cancellations since the White Paper leak, travellers citing “uncertainty about Malta’s future charm”. Meanwhile, Enemalta data shows micro-excavators—the go-to tool for illegal basement expansions—have flown off hire-company shelves, a sign that some are rushing to beat any retroactive clampdown.

The government remains defiant. Parliamentary Secretary for Planning Chris Bonett told HOT Malta that “the PN wants to freeze Malta in a museum; we want living cities”. He promised a final round of public consultation in September, but refused to rule out pushing the law through by year-end.

Back outside the PA offices, Bernard Grech raised a battered copy of the 1992 Development Planning Act—ironically passed by a PN administration. “We made mistakes then,” he admitted to the crowd. “But it’s never too late to correct course. Withdraw this monster, go back to the drawing board, and let’s draft a law our grandchildren will thank us for.”

As the sun glinted off the limestone, protesters chanted “Ħażin, mhux tajjeb!”—“Wrong, not right!”—a slogan last heard during the 2015 spring hunting referendum. Whether the government listens this time will decide if Malta’s skyline retains its human scale, or surrenders to the elevator music of yet another glass tower.

Similar Posts