As the echoes of raised voices and clapping hands faded into the night, the University of Malta’s Debating Chamber in Msida fell silent. The first ever joint leaders’ debate between the Students’ Council and the KSU had ended, leaving behind a whirlwind of opinions and a clear divide among the candidates. Here are five key takeaways from the heated exchange.

The cost of education was the elephant in the room, with both sides agreeing that it’s a pressing issue. However, their solutions differed greatly. The incumbent Students’ Council proposed a cap on student fees, while the KSU advocated for a review of the entire fee structure. The debate highlighted the stark reality that many Maltese students face – the struggle to balance their education with part-time jobs to make ends meet.

Mental health emerged as a key concern, with both sides acknowledging the need for more support services on campus. The Students’ Council pointed to their Mental Health Awareness Week as a step in the right direction, while the KSU promised to push for more counsellors and a 24/7 support line. The debate underscored the importance of mental health, especially in the face of increasing academic pressure.

The Great Hall renovation project sparked a fiery exchange. The Students’ Council defended their decision to proceed with the project, arguing that it would enhance student life. The KSU, however, criticized the lack of consultation and the use of student funds for what they deemed a low-priority project. The debate highlighted the divide between the two sides, with the Students’ Council focusing on immediate improvements and the KSU advocating for more student involvement in decision-making processes.

The candidates differed in their visions for student engagement. The Students’ Council boasted about their successful events and initiatives, while the KSU promised to create a more inclusive and representative student body. The debate revealed a stark contrast between the two sides – one focused on delivering results, the other on involving students in the process.

The debate marked a shift in student politics, with both sides presenting clear, well-thought-out manifestos and engaging in strong debate. It was a stark contrast to the often lacklustre student elections of the past. As the candidates made their final pitches, one thing was clear – the future of student politics in Malta is set to be more vibrant and engaging than ever before.

As the candidates left the Debating Chamber, the students who had filled the room dispersed into the night, their minds filled with the echoes of promises and plans. which side they’ll put their trust in come election day.